How To Beat Feelings With Facts

  Үзсэн тоо 687,062

Charisma on Command

2 жилийн өмнө

How To Make an Amazing First Impression:
Subscribe to Charisma On Command’s MNpost Account:

Sam Harris has been one of the world's most formidable debaters for nearly 20 years. Sam has gone toe to toe with other people we've covered on the channel, like Ben Shapiro & Jordan Peterson, and he has held his own.
In this video, we will break down 5 reasons Sam Harris is so excellent in his debates, and how you too can use these tactics to your advantage.
0:50 Tip #1: Identify the premise
1:14 Tip #2: Apply your opponents logic to extreme situations
3:41 Tip #3: Use conciliatory statements
5:08 Tip #4: Frequently crack jokes
6:22 Tip #5: Use vivid, specific imagery
Connect With Us Further:
Facebook: charismaoncommand
Instagram: @CharismaOnCommand
Or if you want to see our personal stuff (regular life + playing music):
Instagram: @CharlieHoupert
Instagram: @IamBenAltman

Zacc B
Zacc B 7 өдрийн өмнө
Be careful with how much you admire Mr. Harris, you may end up replacing an idol. Look for technique, not people.
Dan E Garner
Dan E Garner 8 өдрийн өмнө
Last i checked Sam Harris hadn't figured out the scamdemic, so he's on the wrong side at a most crucial time, and not as smart as he thinks.
Carneval 11 өдрийн өмнө
He's not excellent. Basic logic eludes him. "Math is subjective" - Sam Harris 2013
Disart projec
Disart projec 16 өдрийн өмнө
WHAT A GOOD VIDEO most of what Sam Harris does seems like magic to me!
Stan Clark
Stan Clark 17 өдрийн өмнө
Good video... debating is an art.. 'uvd helped it along.
Stan Clark
Stan Clark 17 өдрийн өмнө
Jokes are important in a social sense. Rational thought is king in coming to beneficial results.
Stan Clark
Stan Clark 17 өдрийн өмнө
Good video.... The Ben Affleck debate (non-debate),,, this is mainstream media doing it's profitably destructive product. I mean some years ago, especially post 9-11, the "BAd Muslims" were in one of the local papers CONSTANTLY. aFFLECK takes it to the extreme... the absurd route... by going on to center on ISIS. Then, talking about filling stadiums to support his position. This is called rhetoric, where on has no cogent thought process but just throws around various facts & figures... claiming this proves their possession. Like tons of people paid to see him as Batman... wow,,, Ben Affleck for president. And why in the world are we, in a civilized society, hanging on the opinion of a MOVIE ACTOR... some one who works & lives in a fantasy world of make believe entertainment? Because people want to take the easy way out and not think for themselves... we will let a celebrity do it for us.... Is this mature thinking...? Try beginning with mature think.
Stan Clark
Stan Clark 17 өдрийн өмнө
What Sam Harris does here of great civilized value is define a global truth. Redefining the premise accurately,,, one in which Ben Shapiro's intended, beneficial comment can jive into. Excellent.
Stan Clark
Stan Clark 17 өдрийн өмнө
Sam Harris is correct (you needed me to say so-NOT). Ben Schapiro, however, is in fact very, very good at illuminating truth. What his agenda here is I'm not certain... however, his statement does carry water toward the point his is trying to make. I, like your video, take issue with what is the agenda behind this premise. If Ben is aimed at supporting the good works toward civilization , higher knowledge,,, then I would agree that this has been the case... OTOH, there are instances where this is not the case... and motive for people who feel religious to split off from say the Catholic church... go Lutheran. To be the master here towards a productive end... one has to establish how we are here to work towards a productive end. Talking at cross purposes is counterproductive. And media propagates a whole host of means to create content by creating controversy, inflaming issues... instead of resolving it... that's boring,,, and responsible....UUUCCCKKK.
Stan Clark
Stan Clark 17 өдрийн өмнө
ah ha... the "unclear premise." What did I say.
Stan Clark
Stan Clark 17 өдрийн өмнө
The opponent also introduces psychological discord into the equation... by adding,,, "there is something in you that is more than you believe." Which is of course true. The problem with such a third follow on is that it is an overly generalized statement that has vauge, undefined terms and the thinking in the statement is only yet another premise, which deflects in fact from the original premise... muddying the water... and stalling the discussion... as you see Sam Harris hesitate, and momentarily stumble mentally as he is hit with this monkey wrench in the works....
Stan Clark
Stan Clark 17 өдрийн өмнө
There is a legitimate way to assert what you believe... however, in a debate... this opponent is merely asserting a universal truth,,, which could apply to any opinion or belief. Direct rebuttal...SO WHAT? Because you see something as immaterial... the adult response isn't to say that I do... this interchange is like children saying how they feel. The opponent isn't responding with rationality... he's just repeating how he believes... and then intimating there is something wrong with Sam Harris for having a contrary view. Manipulation. Of course there are all degrees of manipulation,,, and impressing upon some one you point isn't necessarily a Machiavellian scheme.
Stan Clark
Stan Clark 17 өдрийн өмнө
A huge lever the manipulative use... is defining the premise... then telling you you have to work off of their premise. Which is exactly what The Sam Harris opponent does in this video. Using the analogy of the absurd outcome is one way to undermine their argument based on the false premise. However,,, analogies can be used by the manipulative to gain the same outcome. So this can come out in a revolving door of onepmanship.
Anil 21 өдрийн өмнө
Love Sam Harris. He's hilarious. And we all need a straight faced comedian.
Dan K
Dan K 24 өдрийн өмнө
You can win debates because you are a better debater. You can even be the smarter and more educated person aside from your debating skills.......but you can still be wrong. You can be wrong partially or completely and you can be extremely well educated in wrongness. It is important to understand this and embrace the humility of truth and wisdom and try to temper your bias in the search for truth.
Tafster J
Tafster J 25 өдрийн өмнө
hink of Sam as the major leagues and Shapiro a minor leaguer at best...maybe pony leagues in fact!!
Mikey 25 өдрийн өмнө
ben affleck, was in over his head from the start, he was there to pick a fight. embarrassing.
Moshe Callen
Moshe Callen 25 өдрийн өмнө
The issue I'd have is the linking of "not taking their religion [Islam here] seriously" and opposition to radicalism at timestamp about 4:30. Without taking away from any of the rest of Mr. Harris's argument and its point, religious people can be serious about their religion while still rejecting radicalism. It's a form of the No True Scotsman fallacy and Mr. Harris generally know better.
Novak Ingood
Novak Ingood 28 өдрийн өмнө
The catholic church proved how devoted they were to scientific enquiry and pursuing knowledge by forcing Galileo to recant his findings and to put him under house arrest for the remainder of his life (Pretty lenient considering their normal treatment of 'heretics'). And it only took the catholic church 359 years to finally admit Galileo (and by inference Copernicus) was right. Yeah, Ben, way to go with how the church lead the advancement of science...
J. L
J. L Сарын өмнө
Very solid logic, understanding of the opponent's fallacies, and the attentive calmness he built from meditation while his opponent gets pulled by emotions and irrationality
Jack K
Jack K Сарын өмнө
he hilarious. God and His word have never lost a single argument to atheists. The atheist is thus embarrassed, including Harris. He is therefore a fool.
Phillip Leighton-Daly
Phillip Leighton-Daly Сарын өмнө
It's a game isn't it for Sam. A popularity contest. What is the point in that. Shall he achieve immortality for his good works on earth. He shall be forgotten in 20 years. Give me Dr King, President Obama, Springsteen, Dylan, Lightfoot, Tolkien, Elliot, et al, ad infinitum. Record something positive for the world Sam rather than attempt to tear down which will remain unanswered for hundreds of years.
John Lange
John Lange Сарын өмнө
Sam Harris is dominant?
Rishabh Sharma
Rishabh Sharma Сарын өмнө
Sam harris is my idol along with elon musk
Hower Power - Gaming 2
Hower Power - Gaming 2 Сарын өмнө
He also speaks very calmly and is well spoken, putting opponents in a to relaxed state.
Harry Renner
Harry Renner Сарын өмнө
He not only does those five things. if he feels a debate didn't go so well he will go back and examine the debate. and annolize the debate in detail. and when he finds flaws for example say he the debate stayed on a topic to long. he will correct that for future debates. he is not afraid to find his weaknesses and correct them.
Adam 2 сарын өмнө
Ok... here’s a thought re:the RC church and scientific inquiry. Now I’m no fan of the RC church the fact remains they did sponsor, fund, allow scientific inquiry to take place when they could just have burnt every person that tried to pursue that scientific discovery and just call them all apostate. Then no scientific discovery would have been made until an atheist came along. And breaking news there’s still a lot of scientists using operational science every day that are Christians, even creationists.
122 mm BR-471B Stalinium projectile
122 mm BR-471B Stalinium projectile 2 сарын өмнө
A reductio is not an "incredible technique" it's common practice in syllogistic debates.
m_train1 2 сарын өмнө
WTF? Sam Harris has never been dominant.
Karsten Bonnaire
Karsten Bonnaire 2 сарын өмнө
It makes no sense watching these videos without practicing or implementing them in your life. Most of these techniques are not ways of manipulating you opponent but simply normal reactions of people who know what they are talking about. Get an opinion first before studying these techniques ... the benefits will be far greater.
Troy VanVliet
Troy VanVliet 2 сарын өмнө
Much of what he presents are not actually arguments, but jokes and sarcasm, that "win over" the audience.
Jack Jackson
Jack Jackson 2 сарын өмнө
Frank n beans Frank n beans We got a bleeder !!!!!!!!
Andreas Jacobsen
Andreas Jacobsen 2 сарын өмнө
Also Harris doesn't use filler words and sounds or unnecessarily odd and long sentences/words (like this one...). He's very concise.
Xavier Alvarez
Xavier Alvarez 2 сарын өмнө
Exactly. His arguments are not wise but he has debating "techniques". Very frustrating to witness intelligent people like Peterson have to "debate" with this kind of person.
William GRAGILLA 3 сарын өмнө
I actually don’t think Sam is that good a debater. When he discusses Objective Moral Value with William Lane Craig he is so backed into a wall he just attacks the premise of a sovereign God. It was nowhere on topic and Dr. Craig calls him out on it. He rarely is able to construct a coherent counter-argument when his ideas are challenged. IE he has a very effective offense but virtually zero defensive capabilities. His discussion with Ezra Klein was over 60 minutes of him repeating the same argument over and over again. ( I am not a fan of Ezra either, he is too woke for me by far). I do hold that Sam did eventually come out on top during that discussion. Also, Mr. Harris ‘ ideas are dangerous to boot; he assumes that he aspires to have the authority to dictate which ideas are acceptable for other people to believe. It’s abhorrent and egomaniacal. That’s why he platforms himself; massive self-importance. Also he isn’t respected nor recognized as a legitimate neuroscientist by a lobby of his peers. Seriously, look up actual neuroscientist critiques of Sam Harris, it’ll paint the picture. His intellect is dwarfed by other intellectuals who have a more elastic mind about Theology. Lastly, if you want to see him crash and burn against a rock-solid argument, listen to him trip over his own johnson when he tries to debate Dennis Prager. Ok my tirade is over.
Valentina Anastasia
Valentina Anastasia 3 сарын өмнө
He's very handsome
Julian Gonzalez
Julian Gonzalez 4 сарын өмнө
Just remember that the goal of an argument isn’t to win, it’s to understand.
UselessHanzo 4 сарын өмнө
Sam is intellectualy honest and his reason is on point.
Marcus Maloney
Marcus Maloney 4 сарын өмнө
Would you call him a..... “mass-debator”? I see myself out
Wit ness
Wit ness 4 сарын өмнө
Ben Shapiro has the most obnoxious voice and energy.
Lanzi Bangli
Lanzi Bangli 5 сарын өмнө
Christopher Hitchens Sam Harris
Alexander Stefanov
Alexander Stefanov 6 сарын өмнө
Uhh maybe because he's usually right, it's hard to argue against logic and truth
Charles Warren
Charles Warren 6 сарын өмнө
Joejoe Brian
Joejoe Brian 6 сарын өмнө
We will never have another Vidal.
ANGRON 6 сарын өмнө
Sam is great, but GOD I MISS HITCH
Michael Wooten
Michael Wooten 6 сарын өмнө
Odd Thor cameo.
Richard Avery
Richard Avery 7 сарын өмнө
Great video, good content. Love Sam as well, he's my favorite speaker alive...
Apocalyptic 7 сарын өмнө
Do you like Matt Dillahunty or Jordan peterson too?
Robert Giles
Robert Giles 7 сарын өмнө
Affeck really thinks he's Batman but he's just batty. ISIS murdered and raped untold victims but Benny never saw or worried at all. He's got celebrity Security everywhere he goes.
GOD6 7 сарын өмнө
2:53 you missed the point... Sam is not denying that the church has at some times at some places been a champion for science, which he shouldn't since is this is correct. He was just saying that its incorrect to say that the church has been essential in the development of science.
Robert Light
Robert Light 7 сарын өмнө
Stick with logic and evidence. Do not let a religionist draw you over the shoals to quoting Bible scripture and arguing within their paradigm. And stay calm.
Andrew Murphy
Andrew Murphy 7 сарын өмнө
The goal of any debate should not be to win, 'destroy' or 'demolish'. It should be to learn, to educate, to persuade.
S F 7 сарын өмнө
I think the most important point with Sam Is, he has a lot of integrity and shows in to the detriment of his own interests. Like the time he left Patreon as one of their biggest creators as he disagreed with their policy and banning of others. Also he is one of the few public figure people I've known that debates, only with good intent
Devina Ayona
Devina Ayona 7 сарын өмнө
That guy's a savage
Mark 7 сарын өмнө
“So dominant”?? He got massacred in his debate with William Lane Craig. And not only him, but Craig destroyed the whole premise of his book, The Moral Landscape as well, pointing out how Harris equivocates on the meaning of the word “good” throughout. We are talking about the same Sam Harris, right?
Paul Keohane RE
Paul Keohane RE 8 сарын өмнө
Jordan Peterson is better ...
Harry Wakatipu
Harry Wakatipu 8 сарын өмнө
Isn't reductio ad absurdum a logical fallacy?
P. Ness
P. Ness 8 сарын өмнө
Not a beast master like Jordan
Buff Garlic Hero
Buff Garlic Hero 8 сарын өмнө
I think this video misses the point. Sam Harris is not trying to dominate or score points, but he is trying to shed light on topics. He is deconstructing arguments not to "own" his opponents, but to produce more clarity for everyone listening. The best debates he had weren't even debates, they were collaborative discussions, with no side trying to win.
David Bow Wow
David Bow Wow 8 сарын өмнө
Love this analysis! Could be a little slower in explaining but the content is great!
CauseOfDeath 8 сарын өмнө
He isn't really good at "debating" per say. He is good at making jokes at the expense of his opponent and usually insulting their position to gain favor with the audience. It's a form of character assassination to make the audience like inclined to take the opponents position seriously, even if they make good arguments. He would make a great politician in this regard but not really a good debater. Debating should be about discussing a certain topic in a more academic and professional way, referencing evidence to make ones argument. Not making fun of your opponent so that people will laugh at your jokes. You're not a stand up comedian.
قلم رصاص
قلم رصاص 8 сарын өмнө
I wanna c him debating mohammed hijab then will c how smart is he
Derek Holcomb
Derek Holcomb 8 сарын өмнө
After that panel, I haven’t watched anything Ben “asshat” Affleck appeared in. I still haven’t seen Batman vs Superman.
eric welch
eric welch 8 сарын өмнө
ben afleck is a giant tool awful actor who if not for the great actors around him would have been booted from hollywood long ago, and who has zero understanding of logical fallacy, something which seems to be his only MO for conversation
gamerjoe.a 9 сарын өмнө
wait can someone explain the difference between reductio ad absurdum and strawmanning?
Kadui Saui
Kadui Saui 9 сарын өмнө
Mr. Furious
Daniel Cairol
Daniel Cairol 9 сарын өмнө
Reason 1: because he’s right
ninthRing 9 сарын өмнө
Ben Shapiro is a good debater - seriously..!? The man is a master at the Gish Gallop & so often mis-characterizes his opponents arguments, that he might as well be facing the Scarecrow from the Wizard of Oz (an actual "straw man").
Jokke 9 сарын өмнө
I'm not sure its accurate to see Sam Harris as exceptionally brilliant. Most in both the neurology and philosophy communities of academia don't think he's all that clever. But he's a decent enough debater as far as that sport goes
Marc Baxter
Marc Baxter 9 сарын өмнө
Nobody ever thinks he got some ears?
Nick215961 9 сарын өмнө
its called the socratic method ...
Thang Tran
Thang Tran 9 сарын өмнө
I liked him on Meet the Parents.
Oh yeah yeah yeah
Oh yeah yeah yeah 9 сарын өмнө
Step 1: Be intellectually superior to everyone in the room.
Mike Degregorio
Mike Degregorio 9 сарын өмнө
How to win a Debate! Argue from a point of nothing and consume your opponent like a Black Hole.
XCell Noah
XCell Noah 9 сарын өмнө
Conciliatory statements to me seem like such an unnecessary disclaimer that illuminates the common sense in the matter (common sense doesn't need to be translated or spelled out, so it's just a waste of time and words).
sfurules 9 сарын өмнө
I may have misunderstood your argument here, but the reductio ad absurdum thing is actually a logic fallacy, and something to NOT be used in intellectual debate. What Sam is doing isn't reductio ad absurdum. He's just good at applying the same logic to scenarios outside of the context of religion, which shows how silly the beliefs are. That's just good argument.
EpicMusicLemon 9 сарын өмнө
It is also because he is factually right about most of his topics......
Lucy Haddant
Lucy Haddant 9 сарын өмнө
Sam will never be close to the ONLY debater who made grown men cry: the late Christopher Hitchens. God bless Hitch 😀
01-Abraham Jebaze
01-Abraham Jebaze 9 сарын өмнө
"God bless?" damn!!!
Imran M
Imran M 9 сарын өмнө
Sam Harris vs any reputable Islamic Scholar, any videos??
carpballet 9 сарын өмнө
You talk way too much. Find and play the examples.
SmashEX Entertainment
SmashEX Entertainment 9 сарын өмнө
No matter how good Sam Harris is, unfortunately everyone he debates are going to the very next debate with exact same crap and hope next debater will not be able to beat 'em. And even if he does, that changes nothing for the every debate that are yet to come.
Rawle Tucker
Rawle Tucker 9 сарын өмнө
He is smart but he is a whiner!
Abe Somers
Abe Somers 9 сарын өмнө
THIS ISN'T WHAT REDUCTIO AD ABSURDUM IS!, That would be restating what they say in an absurd way, what sam harris does is tests their logic under extreme situations. Edit: also it's a logical fallacy DO NOT USE IT!
Mathias Renneberg
Mathias Renneberg 9 сарын өмнө
@Abe Somers No problem, have a nice day.
Abe Somers
Abe Somers 9 сарын өмнө
@Mathias Renneberg No you're right my bar
Mathias Renneberg
Mathias Renneberg 9 сарын өмнө
@Abe Somers Strawmanning is strawmanning. Reductio ad absurdum is about taking a statement to it's logical conclusions to show that the statement is unreasonable. A very quick Google search will tell you all about its place in logical reasoning, mathematics and philosophy.
Abe Somers
Abe Somers 9 сарын өмнө
@Mathias Renneberg It literally means reduced to absurdity, Sam Harris says if you follow logic X, y would be true(in which case y sounds ridiculous), reductio as absurdum would just be mocking the argument and straw maning it.
Mathias Renneberg
Mathias Renneberg 9 сарын өмнө
I think you need to reinvestigate that.
John Connolly
John Connolly 10 сарын өмнө
It’s amazing how all the people you praise on here is some sort of far-right dickwad. Trump, Shapiro, Peterson, this edgelord. You couldn’t find a single liberal who is a good communicator? Really? Or is it just that this channel is actually just a way of promoting these extreme political views?
Laurelindo 5 сарын өмнө
Jordan Peterson is more of a left-winger; that's why he is so incredibly open-minded about various different topics and tries to actually have a mature discussion with people.
fritzki1 10 сарын өмнө
"what i would like to see more with public intellectuals" - shows jordan peterson and bloody joe rogan... we live in impoverished times
Scott Mahoney
Scott Mahoney 10 сарын өмнө
I would hardly call Ben Affleck a "public intellectual" 😅
davidich 3
davidich 3 10 сарын өмнө
This Guy is a mélange of ben stiller=macron
J D 10 сарын өмнө
A worm
La Hive
La Hive 10 сарын өмнө
Because he challenges people who are arguing for a point that doesn't exist.
Ankur Borwankar
Ankur Borwankar 10 сарын өмнө
Sam Harris looks like Ben Stiller, we get it. I'm still waiting for someone to talk about how much Ben Shapiro looks like Kendall Jenner.
zberteoc 10 сарын өмнө
Who the f is Sam Harris? :D
Breambo 10 сарын өмнө
Sam Harris is a hack. He was demolished by William Lane Craig. He claims reason, common sense and the laws of logic yet he cannot account for them. His argument is over before it even starts.
Jp Jp
Jp Jp 10 сарын өмнө
I hate to argue thus when someone tries, I tell them, "I don't care."
nonomos 10 сарын өмнө
who cares?
S Z 10 сарын өмнө
I have a question for atheists. What is the meaning of life? Chasing our desires? / who created the first fly? The first ape? The first dog? The first cat? The first tree? The first fruit? The first ant? Their is no possible way all of these creatures just poped on into existence without a creater right?
Man of God
Man of God 10 сарын өмнө
“Who created the first fly? Ape? Dog?...” I’ll correct you - “What created the first fly” Answer: They evolved over time, from the first living cell to multicellular organism. “Ok, where did the first living cell come from?” It formed in pores of deep-sea black smokers.
The Everything Channel
The Everything Channel 10 сарын өмнө
Is he dominant in debates though? He "wins" by popular vote. His facts are scattered and random. . Thats all i wanted to say
MrRocksW 10 сарын өмнө
I saw him debate with Jordan peterson in Dublin, hadn't heard of him before that. Hes a great speaker
John Herriot
John Herriot 10 сарын өмнө
He who knows the least, knows it the loudest. This is why Sam always waits for the other person to finish shouting or babbling
Hollow Mirror
Hollow Mirror 10 сарын өмнө
Sam Harris suggested blowing up part the middle east to show "strength" ( overcompensating for insecurity) as if the planet could survive a nuclear war. And he is a neuroscientist? What a clown!
simon lloyd
simon lloyd 10 сарын өмнө
what i always find staggering is how intellectuals like Shapiro and Peterson invoke the most inconsistent and illogical mental gymnastics and semantic word play inorder to cross the bridge between logic, reason, empirical evidence and proof. They will apply rigorous logic in every sphere of discourse EXCEPT deep is the indoctrination of cultural faith. There are some superb books on the subject of why humans are predisposed to superstitious and religous belief that provide a fascinating insight.
apoc214 10 сарын өмнө
We get it, you have a lot of other videos. Maybe you don't have to say it quite so often...
Random Ashe
Random Ashe 10 сарын өмнө
But Sam Harris didn't cool it down with Ben Affleck because Ben Affleck was just embarrassing himself and looked like he was on the verge of tears. Don't defeat your enemy when they are more than willing to defeat himself.
7 Psychological Tricks To Win Any Argument
Charisma on Command
Үзсэн тоо 9сая
Doja Cat - Kiss Me More (Official Video) ft. SZA
Үзсэн тоо 50сая
Billie Eilish - Your Power (Official Music Video)
Үзсэн тоо 50сая
How To Argue With Someone Who Won’t Listen
Charisma on Command
Үзсэн тоо 2,2сая
Christopher Hitchens and Sam Harris on is there an afterlife full debate
Sam Harris - Faith vs Reason in the Modern World
Үзсэн тоо 288мянга.
5 Psychological Tricks To Win Any Argument
Charisma on Command
Үзсэн тоо 1,3сая
How to Instantly Achieve a Calm State | Sam Harris on Impact Theory
Sam Harris & Brian Greene (Audio Fixed)
Үзсэн тоо 268мянга.
Sam Harris - Death and the Present Moment
Atheist Foundation of Australia Inc
Үзсэн тоо 1,9сая
4 Ways To Instantly Command More Respect
Charisma on Command
Үзсэн тоо 1,4сая
Sam Harris roasts Trump again for 14 minutes
The Pondering Primate
Үзсэн тоо 1,1сая
Doja Cat - Kiss Me More (Official Video) ft. SZA
Үзсэн тоо 50сая
Billie Eilish - Your Power (Official Music Video)
Үзсэн тоо 50сая
21 PARENTING HACKS || Easy Tricks for Crafty Parents
5-Minute Crafts
Үзсэн тоо 2,6сая
Must Supervise Children While Playing Toys!
Telinga Gajah
Үзсэн тоо 29сая
5-Minute Crafts LIKE
Үзсэн тоо 2,7сая
LILI's FILM - Vlog with JISOO
Lilifilm Official
Үзсэн тоо 7сая